NOHARMM Logo-Home Link

 

FAQ

Research

Education

Advocacy

Litigation

 

Search

Ideas

For Media

Videos

Bookstore

Quick links to products available in the Campaign for Genital Integrity . . .

     INFORMATIVE VIDEOS: 
    
Facing Circumcision  Eight Physicians Tell Their Stories
     Restoration in Focus  
Instructional Video for Foreskin Restoration
     They Cut Babies, Don't They?  
One Man's Struggle Against Circumcision
     Whose Body, Whose Rights?   Award-winning documentary seen on PBS!

THE BOOK THAT EXPOSES IT ALL: 
    
Circumcision Exposed
Rethinking a Medical and
Cultural Tradition

FORESKIN RESTORATION with:
The P.U.D.  new low pricing!
and The VacuTrac at special pricing!
plus the Foreballs device

 

Religious Exemptions from
Child Abuse Statutes

Position Statement of the
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics

Pediatrics, January 1988


NOTE: Links with a right-facing blue arrow will take you off this site.

 Excerpt from p. 169 (first page of article, column two, second paragraph up from bottom)
  http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/pediatrics;81/1/169.pdf

ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES

Religion plays an important role in the growth and development of many children and families. However, when parental practices have potentially harmful I consequences for the child, state intervention may be warranted. The boundary between parental freedom in child rearing and the interest - or even basic rights - of the child is unclear. However, the constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion do not sanction harming another person in the practice of one's religion, and they do not allow religion to be a legal defense when one harms another.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all pediatricians, pediatric surgeons, and AAP state chapters vigorously take the lead to (1) increase public awareness of the hazards to children growing out of religious exemptions to child abuse and neglect legislation; (2) support legislation in each state legislature to correct statutes and regulations that permit harm to children under the shield of religious exemption; (3) work with other child advocacy organizations and agencies to develop coordinated and concerted public and professional actions for recision of religious exemptions.

The Academy must unequivocally defend the rights of all children to the protection and benefits of the law and medicine when physical harm - or life itself - is in the balance.

Committee on Bioethics, 1986-1987

Norman C. Fost, MD, Chairman
William G. Bartholome, MD
William Reed Bell, MD
Alan R. Fleischman, MD
Arthur F. Kohrman, MD
William B. Weil, Jr, MD

Liaison Representative

Kenneth J. Ryan, M D

AAP Section Liaison

Anthony Shaw, MD

See also: Blue_ArrowD096.gif (140 bytes)Religious Objections to Medical Care Pediatrics, 1997

TopOfPage.gif (184 bytes)


Top of Page
| Home | Updates | FAQ | Research | Education | Advocacy | Litigation | Search | Ideas | For Media | Videos | Bookstore | FactFinder
Your Rights
| Attorneys for the Rights of the Child | Video Excerpt | Dads  | FGC Experts | Position Statement | Harm Form | Class Action

Last updated: 22 May, 2011
1998-2002 NOHARMM. All rights reserved.
  Questions, or problems using this site? Webmaster